Helping
Communities
Make
Better Decisions
OUR PROGRAMS
Our 7 Thematic Areas: Building Self-Reliant Conservation
We transform community-led conservation areas into resilient, self-reliant social enterprises. Our approach is built on the principle that conservation succeeds only when communities are empowered to lead it—and when their institutions generate real financial, ecological, and social returns.
To achieve this, we help Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) evolve into well-managed, investable community enterprises with strong leadership, professional management, and sustainable revenue models. Everything we do is anchored in governance: without strong, accountable leadership and transparent systems, nothing else can last.
From governance and management to protection, enterprise development, livelihoods, and communication, our seven interconnected thematic areas work together to create community-led conservation institutions that are effective, financially sound, and resilient social enterprises.
We equip communities with knowledge and tools to make decisions that grow resilient, sustainable conservation enterprises.
Governance (The Foundational Pillar)
Governance is our cornerstone. We build strong, accountable leadership and drive essential behavior change. Using tools like the GCBF and GIA, we equip leaders with financial oversight skills, creating transparent, community-driven institutions that support long-term investment.
Our Latest News
Beyond Good Intentions: What Makes Community-led Conservation work?
Behind every successful WMA are strong systems, capable leaders, and financial transparency. Discover how community-led conservation enterprises deliver lasting benefits for communities, wildlife, and landscapes.
Local communities are conservation’s most undervalued asset (commentary)
The issue is not commitment or capital, but a misunderstanding of how conservation works. Community-led approaches are more effective and resilient because they place authority with those closest to the land.
Building Collective Power for Equitable Governance
“The law says we should be there,” one group of women reflected during a breakout session, “but the decision-making room still finds ways to leave us out.”







